← Search

Jeff Clay

Lewisville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 55W–36L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeff Clay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Fuerst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Yadkin/Clay/40+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nathan Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-24 · Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Suess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Yadkin/Clay/18+3.5 Mixed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · Yadkin/Clay/18+ Tri Level 4.0/3.5/3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Yadkin/Clay/18+3.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Yadkin/Clay/40+ 3.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-0
W
2026-07-25 · Yadkin/Clay/18+ Tri Level 4.0/3.5/3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Logan Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-02 · Yadkin/Clay/18+3.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renae Caldwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Yadkin/Clay/40+ 3.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 62.2% of games
3.5
60%
15W–10L · 55.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 29.4% of games
6.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 80% of games
3.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer