← Search

Chris Schoonover

Midland, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 60W–43L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Chris Schoonover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
Mike Chancey / John Morris
2026-08-31 · Sabo-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Belisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-15 · Mardis-CC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrick Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Michael May / Nicholas Tkalych
2026-08-15 · Schoonover-CC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tyler Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · Schoonover-CC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chase Hammock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Mardis-CC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrick Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
William Brown / Mark Andrew Borromeo
2026-08-01 · Mardis-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Terrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · Schoonover-CC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brandon Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
William Brown / Kenneth Copperwheat
2026-07-25 · Mardis-CC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ty Ammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Schoonover-CC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Payton Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · Schoonover-CC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marty Griggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · Schoonover-CC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brandon Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · Milton-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
90%
18W–2L · 63.2% of games
3.0
49.3%
34W–35L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.9% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer