← Search

Mike Chancey

— year-end
149 matches · 86W–63L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Mike Chancey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Fahnestock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-02 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Fahnestock-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Centerbar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
David Mann / Alonso Trevizo
2026-09-01 · Cavanaugh-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Fahnestock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-01 · Williamson-CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ketan Dalsania
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · Fahnestock-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-16 · McKenzie-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
David Mann / John Paul Divers
2026-08-15 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Clifford Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
W
2026-08-02 · McKenzie-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Paul Divers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Simmons-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Boles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · McKenzie-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · Simmons-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Boles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Teams86 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.2% of games
3.5
78.7%
48W–13L · 60.8% of games
4.0
35%
21W–39L · 46.8% of games
7.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#1 Singles
24%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe