← Search

Jonah Brum

— year-end
26 matches · 13W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jonah Brum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with AJ Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
W
2026-07-14 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with AJ Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Laurel Oak Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Pennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · Laurel Oak Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Thomas Walsh / Robert Feldmann
2026-03-25 · Laurel Oak 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Lindell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg MXD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Rosenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-19 · Laurel Oak 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Lindell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg MXD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Stroble mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg MXD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yudi Carpenter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
James Protigal / Thomas Walsh
2026-02-19 · Laurel Oak 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Lindell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-14 · Laurel Oak Questionable Calls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 56.1% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.8% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova