Nate Macksey
109 matches · 70W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Nate Macksey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history109 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Josh Rucker / Neeraj Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Rubens Jacob / Pedro Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
75.7%
28W–9L · 61.4% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.7% of games
8.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.