← Search

Jared Cox

Vestavia, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 22W–26L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jared Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-06-24 · Old Overton - Cox · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Cavale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Old Overton - Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Caroline Hall / George Holman
2026-06-07 · Old Overton - Higgins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-31 · Old Overton - Higgins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Shoultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Old Overton - Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brady Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · Old Overton - Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Balzli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Old Overton - Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brady Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-09 · Old Overton - Higgins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-07 · Old Overton - Cox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Cavale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Old Overton - Higgins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Shoultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Old Overton - Cox · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Old Overton - Higgins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 57.1% of games
3.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 52.9% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer