← Search

Nora Stokes

— year-end
55 matches · 22W–33L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Nora Stokes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-09-08 · TRC - Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Pell City women's 6.5 combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Ivey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Pell City women's 6.5 combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Mooneyham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · TRC - Richey/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Weissgerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · TRC - Pounders · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terri Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-08 · Dutton 18+ 3.5 PC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Weissgerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-06 · TRC - Richey/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Weissgerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-30 · TRC - Richey/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Wendy Kitchen / Drue Taylor
2026-03-25 · Dutton 18+ 3.5 PC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Magen Bearden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-18 · TRC - Pounders · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Murrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-17 · TRC - Richey/Ray · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Gallas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-11 · TRC - Richey/Ray · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Richey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 79.1% of games
3.0
38.1%
16W–26L · 43.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams