← Search

Deb Siewing

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 85W–33L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Deb Siewing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hardebeck-White (F) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · Lemp/Grigg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-20 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Lemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
L
2026-04-19 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry O'Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Malpiedi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 74.6% of games
3.5
77.8%
56W–16L · 62.7% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 43.5% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
47 matches
#2 Singles
20%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer