← Search

Cindy Grigg

Wildwood, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 127W–97L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cindy Grigg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Uelhof · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Siewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Norma Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Schutte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Uelhof · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Eisenbeis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Uelhof · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Uelhof · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Brewer/Thomas (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Edstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-6
W
2026-03-11 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Ang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Brewer/Thomas (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.1% of games
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.5
58.3%
112W–80L · 52.8% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova