← Search

Jake Cumsky-Whitlock

Washington, DC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 20W–32L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jake Cumsky-Whitlock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
Ryan Poole / Benjamin Apelbaum
2026-08-30 · DC Tennis Club (Tri-Level Men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Davant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · DC Tennis Club (3.0 men) · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-15 · DC Tennis Club (Tri-Level Men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · DC Tennis Club (Tri-Level Men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Paisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · DC Tennis Club (3.0 men) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-1
W
2026-06-28 · DC Tennis Club (3.0 men) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-3
L
2026-04-26 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · DC Tennis Club (3.0 men) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · DC Tennis Club (3.5 men) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Hyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-28 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-22 · DC Tennis Club · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 43.5% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 28.8% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
14 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova