← Search

Matthew Ganney

Capitol Heights, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 61W–156L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matthew Ganney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hector Vargas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-5
L
2026-03-29 · Chip N Charge · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaShonne Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Isaac Bamman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-03-07 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
L
2026-02-22 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tiffany Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Isaac Bamman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-02-01 · Chip N Charge · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-3
L
2026-02-01 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-04 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
Brad Ziajor / Chandler Williams
2025-11-20 · Chip N Charge · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelsea Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.5% of games
4.0
29.7%
35W–83L · 41.3% of games
7.5
4.5%
1W–21L · 36.8% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 48% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games
8.0mixed
9.5%
2W–19L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe