← Search

Jenni Kneuertz

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 79W–43L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Jenni Kneuertz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaimee Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
W
2026-05-03 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Kopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · New Albany · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Minadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janet Grimm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-12 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Minadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Fithian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-27 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Minadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
W
2026-03-23 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Yassenoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · New Albany · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
72.7%
64W–24L · 58.7% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 48.5% of games
5.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.2% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#2 Singles
16%
19 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova