← Search

Janet Grimm

Westerville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 64W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Janet Grimm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jaimee Hoy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Irene Larsen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvette DeLisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina de Felice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Clinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenni Kneuertz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-06 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Beal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-27 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Nunemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-13 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Nunemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-06 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Clinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
W
2026-03-02 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.5% of games
3.5
34.1%
15W–29L · 44.2% of games
5.5
82.8%
24W–5L · 63.8% of games
6.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams