← Search

Ramsey Rudolph

— year-end
43 matches · 18W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ramsey Rudolph to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-07-21 · MTC - Huettemann/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · CCM - White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Millie Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · MTC - Huettemann/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hartley Winter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
Megan Esslinger / Khanh Nguyen
2026-02-25 · CCM - McConnell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Cave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-03 · CCM- Meador/Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Cave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-02 · CCM - McConnell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nedra Toulmin Morrissette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-29 · CCM- Meador/Cooksey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-19 · CCM - McConnell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-07 · CCM - McConnell · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Frances Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-01-06 · CCM- Meador/Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-03-18 · CCM - Rudolph · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Brantley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-03-11 · CCM - Rudolph · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
9W–9L · 48.2% of games
3.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 38.7% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
16 matches
#1 Singles
26%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal