← Search

Bradley Pavlik

Plymouth, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 90W–35L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bradley Pavlik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-08-04 · CHIP-Palmer 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gonjoo Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Joseph Lopez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aubrey Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
Terry Bowman / Bernie Bowman
2026-07-22 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lonnie Shea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · CHIP-Palmer 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mallory Schardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jay Dalal / Steven Lim
2026-07-13 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dae-Hee Kwak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aubrey Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
100%
18W–0L · 72.7% of games
3.5
71.8%
28W–11L · 62% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 59.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 77.6% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.2% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
15%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert