← Search

Jessica Charlston

Manchester, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jessica Charlston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-04-12 · Neale/Upson (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Karraker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Cheryl St. Cyr / Karen Ganschaw
2026-03-29 · Neale/Upson (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Karraker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Neale/Upson (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Nelson Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Karen Ganschaw / Cheryl St. Cyr
2025-11-16 · Neale/Upson (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Upson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2
L
2025-10-05 · Neale/Upson (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-13 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-06 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Neale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-23 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabrielle Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-16 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Hiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-03-09 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-02-23 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-16 · Neale/Duffy (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert