← Search

Catherine Cashin

Dallas, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 5W–11L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Catherine Cashin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rachel Grim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Kim Brown
2026-06-04 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-27 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley DeVault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-10 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali JACKSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-09 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali JACKSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-09 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali JACKSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-10 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali JACKSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 59.8% of games
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer