← Search

Jessica Rippl

Oakwood, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 49W–38L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Jessica Rippl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sam Linhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · KTC-Hudson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Oue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Hudson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Oue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · KTC-Trubee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Sumner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · KTC-Hudson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jade Odell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · KTC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mari Ishida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · KTC-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mari Ishida
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
Teresa Siefke / Jessica Franklin
2026-06-12 · KTC-Trubee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Autumn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Mary Miller / Lynn Watkins
2026-05-31 · KTC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Gill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-11 · KTC-Trubee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Jessica Franklin / Teresa Siefke
2026-04-28 · QRRC-Brooks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Vitale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · KTC-Trubee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Akemon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 56% of games
3.0
58.3%
28W–20L · 52.1% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.9% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe