← Search

Lisa Yates

— year-end
372 matches · 220W–152L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Yates to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history372 matches
L
2026-07-18 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Loeffelholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · SRTC-Tabrah · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Poe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · KTC-Witting · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Bleidorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samanta Jraisat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · SRTC-Tabrah · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tabatha Ashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
Mary Miller / Doane Wiedeman
2026-06-20 · KTC-Smallwood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noreen Beiersdorfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · KTC-Witting · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meryl Hattenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-13 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanelle Witting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · KTC-Witting · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Bleidorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · KTC-Smallwood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanelle Witting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams77 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
70.8%
160W–66L · 59.8% of games
4.0
36%
27W–48L · 42.9% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 53.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 39.7% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 28.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
133 matches
#2 Singles
20%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams