← Search

Jillian Lapping

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jillian Lapping to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Margherio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Seaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Seaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · Nott, Sasipen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Hummel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Nott, Sasipen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Nott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Melanie Beck / Kevin Jackson
2026-06-12 · Nott, Sasipen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Nott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elloise Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-08 · Nott, Sasipen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandon Nott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Seaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Seaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tiedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-02-22 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
47.8%
22W–24L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 65.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova