← Search

Emily Seaton

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 40W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Seaton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carolyn Lopker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jillian Lapping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Throm, Bridget · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jillian Lapping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Hughes, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Lapping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Lapping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · Hughes, Allison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · Hughes, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · Hughes, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Tiedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · Hughes, Allison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Madarang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · Hughes, Allison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · Hughes, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.5% of games
3.5
51.9%
28W–26L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer