← Search

Suzanne Lomax

— year-end
31 matches · 12W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Lomax to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Posey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Presley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · Wisley/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Samantha Rohlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Wisley/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Leigh Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Campbell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Taylor Wisley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Barbara Wilson / Susan Reyna
2026-07-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Niki Shaheen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristen Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Campbell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Niki Shaheen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Shaila Anderson / Elyse Pickle
2026-04-29 · Greer/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-28 · Pappas/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Stettler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Pappas/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Niki Shaheen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams12 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 45.8% of games
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer