← Search

Dana Guzzo

Germantown, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 19W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dana Guzzo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Bratton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vonya Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Patrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Meg Smith / Meredith Hagan
2026-05-08 · Price/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Bloodworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · O'Neill/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Melanie Schrank / Jennifer Lee
2026-04-29 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Drumwright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · O'Neill/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · O'Neill/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Drake/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · O'Neill/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · O'Neill/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-01 · O'Neill/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carie Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 51.3% of games
3.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 29.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams