← Search

Bailey Wolff

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 42W–15L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Bailey Wolff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Millington/GR/Day4.0W · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · Devinney/GR/Day3.5 W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bunting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · Devinney/GR/Day3.5 W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cody Coggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Cody Coggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Sides/FR/mixed tri 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Swiggett/GR/3.5 tri · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Jokerst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · Hale/LF 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Hale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Hale/LF 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Bedrosian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · Hale/LF 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Bedrosian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-11-05 · Tulsa DAY 1: Wolff/SH/Day 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patterson Rooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-07 · Tulsa DAY 1: Wolff/SH/Day 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patterson Rooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 62.6% of games
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.4% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert