← Search

Beth Wagner

Jenks, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 115W–137L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Beth Wagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Stone/LF/Day4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel DeWitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Raymond Bayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neely Wynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-28 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neely Wynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · Adams/LF 18s 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Byron Canfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Darby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jo Tasker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-12 · Evans/GR/mixed tri 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Raymond Bayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Adams/LF 18s 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raymond Bayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.7% of games
3.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.2% of games
4.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 47.6% of games
4.5
46.3%
50W–58L · 47.7% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
23W–23L · 50.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 22.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
64 matches
#1 Singles
7%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe