← Search

Mickey Neverman

— year-end
36 matches · 16W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mickey Neverman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-03-10 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Urrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-24 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Urrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Steve Kim / Arnold Abaigar
2026-02-19 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Zummo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-17 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-10 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-24 · YMCA:Pagliuca:Jamback · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · YMCA:Pagliuca:Jamback · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jana Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-21 · YMCA:Pagliuca:Jamback · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenna Settino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-07 · YMCA:Pagliuca:Jamback · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
Jonathan Lee / Greg Schurter
2025-11-20 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Urrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-06 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Urrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-30 · Missouri City - Quail Valley Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Urrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.9% of games
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 38.9% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 32.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#1 Singles
19%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer