← Search

Chuck Stasny

RICHMOND, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 18W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Chuck Stasny to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-06-27 · Briggs-Grand Oaks High School · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Briggs-Grand Oaks High School · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Briggs-Grand Oaks High School · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Jeff Hechler / Charles Martin
2026-03-19 · Missouri City - Tennis Bums · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yulim Tey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-24 · Missouri City - Tennis Bums · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ali Batu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-02-17 · Missouri City - Tennis Bums · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonio Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-09 · Missouri City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Daniel Daly / David Trevas
2025-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tin Dang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quan Vu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-12 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-04-12 · Wideman - Double Trouble · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
L
2024-10-31 · Missouri City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Garza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 35% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.6% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova