← Search

Jeff VanRoy

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 33W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeff VanRoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-13 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-1
W
2026-07-06 · Vasholz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Vasholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Vasholz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-28 · Obermier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · NE/Acker/18&Over6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Girard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · Obermier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-05 · Erwin/Redding · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · NE/Acker/18&Over6.0X · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emily Girard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · Vasholz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Crotzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · Vasholz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Seto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · Mixed Doubles on the Rocks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Hass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · Mixed Doubles on the Rocks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 78.2% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.1% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova