← Search

Jennifer Christensen

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 75W–52L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Johnson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Gilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Katie Sandquist / Melissa Hass
2026-09-02 · Johnson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Johnson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Gilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · Johnson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kirsten Holm-Caskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Gilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · Tong · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Bernal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff VanRoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-1
L
2026-07-10 · Tong · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eamon Adamson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Gilroy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Gilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Gilroy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Hesse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Gilroy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Gilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.4% of games
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.2% of games
3.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 59.4% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova