← Search

Serena Kossisyan-Perlman

— year-end
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Serena Kossisyan-Perlman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-07 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kay Sowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Davenport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-13 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-20 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cannon Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-06 · LDyer (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Heather Hagar / Natalie Costello
2025-11-14 · LDyer (Mountainbrook); MBC Net Nannies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Pearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-05-02 · SPurdy (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 46.5% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams