← Search

Jim Rogers

Leland, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jim Rogers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-05-05 · Melcher/Poole BF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Koehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · Melcher/Poole BF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hugh Sutherland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-04 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-05-05 · Melcher/Poole BF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Swinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Rick Chambers / Son Nguyen
2025-04-28 · Melcher/Poole BF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Sean Fuller / Jeff Smith
2025-04-21 · Melcher/Poole BF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-04-12 · Melcher/Poole BF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Swinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-03-29 · Melcher/Poole BF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
60%
9W–6L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer