← Search

Doug MacCall

Southport, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 40W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Doug MacCall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Baxter/O'Connor 6.5 55+ · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fred Broyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · Holstein SJP 55+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Holstein SJP 55+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cliff Zoller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Holstein SJP 55+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · WILSON DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara MacCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · WILSON DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara MacCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-06 · WILSON DAY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara MacCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · WILSON DAY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara MacCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Camille Restione / John Murray
2026-06-13 · WILSON DAY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara MacCall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · O'Connor / Baxter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Friedland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · O'Connor / Baxter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · O'Connor / Baxter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Bradcovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 55.9% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.5% of games
7.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 66.5% of games
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Singles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King