← Search

Ramey Hardin

— year-end
56 matches · 36W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ramey Hardin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Priscilla Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · Gaines- NC -Cc Oxford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Sivley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · Gaines - NC - CC Oxford · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Catherine Boudreaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Powell- 4.0- Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Powell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · Powell- 4.0- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Powell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · Black- NC- Oxford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Mcavoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-11 · Black- NC- Oxford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Mcavoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-04 · Black- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Catherine Boudreaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · Black- NC- Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Catherine Boudreaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-07 · Campbell- NC- Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Murre Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.3% of games
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.6% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 55.4% of games
4.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe