← Search

Lindsey Garner

— year-end
63 matches · 35W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lindsey Garner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Emily Green - NC - 18+ 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roni Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Hopkins - NC- Southaven · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ginna Abbey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Emily Green - NC - 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tavleen Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-16 · Nabors/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Nabors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Garner 18+ NC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Garner 18+ NC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristen Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Hopkins - NC- Southaven · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lou Ann Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Hottinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · Green - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lou Ann Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · TerBurgh/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-30 · Green - NC - Southaven · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophia Runer Folk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.8% of games
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 66% of games
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 49% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 46.1% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe