← Search

Brett Echerd

Nashville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brett Echerd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-06-13 · Clapp/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi van Ameringen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
William Allen / Brianna Hardy
2026-05-30 · Clapp/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Pietsch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
Rod Baine / James Jackson
2026-04-11 · Fogarty/Jett/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-15 · Fogarty/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Jett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-08 · Fogarty/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Damon Reid / Michael Ladd
2025-11-01 · Fogarty/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · Fogarty/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-25 · Fogarty/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-18 · Fogarty/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-04 · Fogarty/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
David Goodwin / Jerry Zhang
2025-03-30 · Fogarty/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Pietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-04 · Horn/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Pietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 35.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches
#1 Singles
18%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer