← Search

Lalita Rattanavong

— year-end
50 matches · 43W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lalita Rattanavong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
Emily Walker / Holly Fisher
2026-08-18 · Shaffer/Parrish/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shanoa Eastland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · Shaffer/Parrish/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Harlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Stephanie Knight / Caroline Bailey
2026-08-04 · Shaffer/Parrish/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kellie Sallis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Gannon/Triplett/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Triplett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Vandever/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Gannon/Triplett/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Waterbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Vandever/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Vandever mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · Vandever/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Aponte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Vandever/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Vandever mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Hannah Deeke
2026-04-25 · Shaffer/Vandever/Murfreesboro · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-21 · Shaffer/Vandever/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-14 · Shaffer/Vandever/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams15 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 82.2% of games
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 84.7% of games
3.5
81.8%
18W–4L · 68.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.1% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe