← Search

David Little

Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 33W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add David Little to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-03-18 · Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-03 · Little/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-04 · Little/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-21 · Little/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Evan Muckleroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jackson Arbeitman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Hershel Blevins / David Taylor
2025-10-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hayes Shimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dusty Mikula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Robby Herbert / Jose Gonzalez
2025-09-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edran Ali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Max Bachman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deric Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 69% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.6% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 43% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#2 Singles
20%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams