← Search

Kristin Daniels

Windsor, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 49W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kristin Daniels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-31 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Kim Murray / Stephanie Mabley
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Grim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Stowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · HMTC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Grim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · HMTC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberley Hattem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · HMTC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Seiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-0
W
2026-07-08 · HMTC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelsi Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Stowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · HMTC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Seiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
70.5%
43W–18L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
39 matches
#1 Singles
21%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova