← Search

Jessica Allman

Fort Collins, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 24W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Allman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-07-29 · FCCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · FCCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chanel Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · FCCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · FCCC TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chanel Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 69.6% of games
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 58.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams