← Search

Sean Grant

— year-end
37 matches · 19W–18L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sean Grant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-07-08 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tae-Hwa Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Belcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srinivasa Shankar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chang Sun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Neel Sukhatme / Stephen Miller
2026-06-01 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajesh Jayaraman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Bahrou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-0
L
2026-05-13 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bala Kondur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.3% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 48.7% of games
7.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova