← Search

Srinivasa Shankar

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 43W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Srinivasa Shankar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eva Bieniek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maribel Weitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Quint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ned Staebler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Eyde mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Beaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Michael Haffey / Richard Green
2026-07-06 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chang Sun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Bahrou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Bieniek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
55.1%
27W–22L · 53.3% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.2% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 41.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova