← Search

Aubrey Pavlik

Plymouth, MI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 46W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Aubrey Pavlik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Rosenwasser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Trumbull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Trumbull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-08 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 75.2% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.1% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 69.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer