← Search

Tara Thornton

— year-end
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tara Thornton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-04-09 · 2.5 PTC The Prickly Pairs W18S · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Furnish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-02 · 2.5 PTC The Prickly Pairs W18S · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Furnish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-12 · 2.5 PTC The Prickly Pairs W18S · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-05 · 2.5 PTC The Prickly Pairs W18S · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-12-11 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18F · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Faber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-06 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18F · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
L
2025-10-30 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18F · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-16 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18F · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-29 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-25 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18F · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thyme Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-03-27 · 2.5 PTC BattleAxes W18S · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Blankinship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-24 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Claybaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams10 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–8L · 31.4% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.2% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#1 Singles
22%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer