← Search

Claire Erasmus

Surprise, AZ
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 17W–2L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Claire Erasmus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-04-16 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-09 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-26 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-19 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christina Silva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alicja Pasiut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-26 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-19 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-05 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-29 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-01-22 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-15 · PHX/Silva/18&O/2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elena Amavisca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
2.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 84% of the time
#1 Doubles
84%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams