← Search

Elizabeth Cook

Bryant, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 45W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Junior/LR/OC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with CARMEN RICE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anita Junior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · Brown/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kisha Boston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Cheryl Johnson / Debra Nathaniel
2026-07-23 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Feng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brice Sisco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Brown/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Camille Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dean Worley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Junior/LR/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pablo Sanchez Soria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Junior/LR/OC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angele Forrest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Karrie Miller / Kristin Connell
2026-07-09 · Brown/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Sisco/Benton/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dean Worley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 57.7% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 51.6% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.6% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams