← Search

Amy Lane

Benton, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 46W–46L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amy Lane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Breaker/Ward/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mitsy Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-27 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haylee Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-29 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Sisoukrath/Benton/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JP Wade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Morshedi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Bender mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sisco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Sisco/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Good mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-30 · Watts/Murdock/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haylee Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.8% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 43.4% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 61.5% of games
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 47.8% of games
3.5mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams