← Search

Catherine Soucie

Henrico, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Catherine Soucie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Stamper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · Westwood Bowman Broads · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Westwood Bowman Broads · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jaclyn Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Noack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Stamper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Westwood Rally Cats - Layman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Naomi Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Niyati Upadhyay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Whiteside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.3% of games
3.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.5% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.4% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams