← Search

Anne Wolff

Midlothian, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 52W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Anne Wolff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Learn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-02 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · Belmont Beauties Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelli Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-26 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peanut Kempe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-19 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynette Villadelgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayci McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peanut Kempe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · MAC Maniacs Bates · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Brogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
33W–22L · 55.6% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 26% of games
6.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.6% of games
6.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 45.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 46.6% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova