← Search

Cassidy Pearson

Columbus, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 39W–11L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Cassidy Pearson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Kelley-CCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-29 · Johnson-CC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Delaubell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Madi McMichael Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Delaubell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Moseley-CCC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Morgan Muller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · Pearson-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Bleke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Champion-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Pearson-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Champion-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forrest Champion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
95%
19W–1L · 75.8% of games
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 55.7% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 68% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
20%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams