← Search

Lisa Neal

— year-end
37 matches · 19W–18L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Lisa Neal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Richburg-CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Stone-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-20 · Richburg-CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Neal-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kayla Bloor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · Neal-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martha Meador
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cassidy Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Champion-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · Champion-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Ezell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · Champion-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Champion-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reed Bickerstaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Courville/Stone-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-19 · Courville/Stone-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Hannay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 50.1% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 33.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King